Qa software tools open source

The number one advantage is cost — particularly the cost of entry. Open source technologies, such as Selenium , are free to use. If you're a cost conscious team, utilizing open source technologies is a great option. Another advantage is the flexibility that is gained by going open source. Some of the most popular open source technologies come with large communities of support that are behind them. And with that support comes cool libraries and approaches that are built by other engineers with a passion for testing.

Whereas commercial tools are often times closed systems with limited flexibility beyond their primary goal. Additionally, open source technology supports multiple languages. This means you can utilize the technologies that are most widely used among your technology teams to help support the automation frameworks built in open source.

The number one disadvantage in my mind is the skill set necessary to build and maintain the automation suite. You have to remember that most open source tools are created by people for a specific reason. And when that reason is fulfilled, then the support for that tool can wane. Meaning the lifespan of an open source tool maybe limited. If you follow the news of the technology world, you have seen a huge amount of pieces on a data breach or a website being hacked.

Hacking tools and techniques keep growing more sophisticated and threatening, and if you want your software to be safe, you need to be one step ahead. And that is what security testing and penetration testing tools are for. Their primary function is to check the software for vulnerabilities that could result in hacking and data leak, without accessing the source code.

Those vulnerabilities must be immediately identified and addressed, which is done through continuous and automated scanning procedures that aim to find potential loopholes in the software. There are a number of security testing tools in the market, so we have cut this list to the top 10 open source web testing tools as they are free and can be customized to your specific requirements.

Netsparker is a great tool with the main advantage of being easy to use. Such user friendliness singles this one out from the rest.

Besides, it is a powerful tool that gives highly accurate results. It can identify such vulnerabilities as SQL injection and cross-site scripting among more than others. You can scan any web-related app, checking for coding related errors. This tool uniquely verifies the identified vulnerabilities proving they are not false positives but real.

Such possibility saves your time on verifying the identified vulnerabilities manually after a scan. On the flip side, you may want to remove some technologies the scan will be checking if you expect it to be a fast process.

OpenVAS is a vulnerability analysis tool that is used to scan servers and network devices. This scanner will look for an IP address and check for any open services by scanning through open ports, improper configuration and vulnerabilities in existing objects. After the scan is completed, an automatic report is generated and sent by email for further study and correction. It is all coded up easily in Python and super confgurable - also not as heavy as Bugzilla or cumbersome to confgure as Mantis.

Enrico Oliva asks why not use Test Manager plug-in for Trac to integrate test management. Integrating TestLink as a test management tool was a good choice for their needs.

Pankaj Goenka recommends the web-based bug tracker as it provides features like high confgurability, email integration, search, screen-capture utility and ability to add custom felds. Sreenadh OG further explains that after a review of numerous available solutions he preferred BugTracker. The awesome fact is that the whole product is developed by a single individual, and his future target list and future plans are also simply unique and herculean!

Figure-3 shows the popularity of the diferent open source test management software tools and open source tools that provide complete solutions containing bug tracking and test management, that have been recommended in the linkedin group discussion by the members. Like Srikanth Reddy Komandla , most found it easy to create and manage Test cases as well as organize them into Test plans using TestLink. These Test plans allow team members to execute Test cases and track test results dynamically, generate reports, trace software requirements, prioritize and assign tasks.

The general consensus was, as Renuka Arunkumar points out that it possesses almost all qualities of HP Quality Center. It needs to be combined with a defect-tracking tool, like Mantis, Bugzil-la. Renuka uses Redmine. Francis Law had a good tip that it even includes a very simple requirement management module, thus bringing it closer to QC standards. Business people or clients that just want to see the testing progress may fnd it a little bit complicated to navigate.

But still, she feels, this combination is the best open source test management and defect tracking tool. Ameer Khoja agrees with Oana, but he feels that installation can be a little tricky. There is a reporting plug-in, which you can install on top of it. Sarath Chandrasekhar thinks that Testopia, which is basically TestRunner integrated with Bugzilla, is the platform that comes very close to HP Quality Center in terms of documenting, organising, assigning and executing Test cases.

It includes a Test Cycle History and a loosely coupled integration between the Defect number and Test case. Kiran Deram explains that it was developed on ruby on rails technology. He feels that it is a wonderful tool for Test Management and bug tracking as it can be customized. Eric Gavaldo gives a detailed analysis of its features. He comments that XStudio handles the complete life cycle of the projects: users, requirements, specifcations, projects dev, testing, etc.

It allows scheduling or running fully automated or manual test campaigns. It also provides some tools to measure the coverage of testing i. In addition, the SDK allows one to develop specifc launchers to interface with proprietary tests.

It includes a very good and appreciated bug-tracking database but can also integrate with: Mantis, Bugzilla, Trac, Jira. The figure-4 below shows the popularity of the diferent commercial software tools discussed in the group discussion by the members of the business-oriented social network LinkedIn. Generally, the consensus was that Atlassian is developing quite an impressive portfolio. Firstly, it gives them the information they want to see and secondly it is easy and intuitive for QA engineers and development engineers to work with.

He says that his company uses it for facilities, tech support, IT helpdesk, hardware engineering, software engineering, and RMA reporting and metrics. The work-fows are user customizable and performance is pretty good.

The only negative is that the search facility is not very good. It is an excellent and very easy to customize. In the mobile domain, more bug felds are required to defne a bug properly. We have customized it successfully and we are executing release management and defect prevention nicely.

Most of these members were of the same opinion as Kiril Strax, who thinks it is difcult to fnd another product that would match all the possibilities of QC e. But it has two drawbacks: the price, and the fact that the client side must reside on Windows even worse: you are mostly limited to IE. Starting from the requirement defnition and the linking possibility between the requirements and raised bugs and created Test cases, it simplifes the follow up for testers and provides extensive reporting tools for management.

This is one reason why the software market is flooded with hundreds of test-automation frameworks. Although teams could build elaborate automated testing frameworks, there's usually little reason to spend the money, resources, and person-hours to do so when they can achieve equal or even better results with existing open source tools, libraries, and testing frameworks.

Other reasons to use existing open source test-automation frameworks is that they are:. Because different businesses have different needs, it's difficult to pinpoint all the things you will want in a test-automation framework.

However, there are some key criteria that most organizations will look for in a test-automation framework:. Selecting the best test-automation framework for your organization can be difficult. To help you evaluate features against your needs and narrow down your options, below I've outlined my top nine open source business automation tools and frameworks. Appium is an open source test-automation framework based on a WebDriver protocol for testing mobile applications.

Built around the idea of uniformity, it allows you to write tests for different platforms using the same APIs. Carina is a popular Java-based test-automation framework built on top of Selenium. Galen specifically caters to UX testing, with specific syntax for testing and verifying your mobile or web application's layout. Gauge , a relatively new test-automation tool, is lightweight and cross-platform. Its beauty is that it's built on a plugin architecture, so it can be used with any language, IDE, and ecosystem.

If you're looking for a straightforward yet detail-oriented test-automation framework, consider Katalon. It is an open source testing framework with support for web, mobile, and API automation testing.