Recall on mesh patch

Surgeon can accidentally cut blood vessels, organs, or cause nerve damage. Patients may develop numbness, pain, trouble urinating, or sexual dysfunction after hernia repair in the groin.

Composix Kugel Mesh patches were recalled three times between and due to the risk of bowel perforations and intestinal fistulas. In , another recall was issued for counterfeit hernia plugs that were falsely labeled as C. Over 3, hernia patch lawsuits have been filed by people who were injured by products that were recalled by C.

Bard and Duval. The lawsuits were consolidated in Rhode Island in In April , a hernia mesh lawsuit was filed against Ethicon by a man from Illinois. Physiomesh was used to plug his abdominal hernia in In , he was diagnosed with two abscesses and an intestinal fistula, which needed another surgery. The lawsuit is scheduled for trial on January 22, before Judge J. Phil Gilbert in the U. In September , a hernia patch lawsuit was filed by a woman from Florida who was implanted with Physiomesh in May Unfortunately, she soon developed chronic pain, digestive problems, and a bowel obstruction.

In July , surgeons tried for two hours but could not remove all of the mesh because it was embedded in her intestines and abdominal wall. The lawsuit was filed in the U. Ethicon, Inc. There is no class action lawsuit for hernia mesh injuries. Instead, thousands of individual lawsuits were centralized under one judge. Class actions are a great way to get refunds, but they are not designed to maximize payouts for people with very severe injuries.

Instead, everyone in a class action shares the payout equally. We have experience filing hernia mesh lawsuits, and are now focusing on Physiomesh lawsuits against Ethicon. The mesh is placed over the hernia, and then attached with a few sutures. The mesh serves as a support system to keep the hernia at bay and is supposed to be designed to both stay in place and eventually be absorbed by the body.

These patches are made out of propolyene, which is the same material of which defective transvaginal mesh patches were made. There were thousands of lawsuits against defective transvaginal mesh. In May, , two separate medical studies found that the Physiomesh patch had a much higher rate of failure and need for repeat surgery than other patches.

This voluntary recall was also issued due to an increase in side effects after the use of the Physiomesh hernia patch. These include the following:. It can also be the cause for the additional surgeries. We will help you receive individual representation and can also help you join a class-action lawsuit should you choose.

We offer individualized and tenacious assistance in your case and will strive to get you the results you deserve. We offer free case reviews. We are proud to serve clients in Columbia, South Carolina and all of the nearby areas. Skip to content. Need to report a mesh malfunction? As a result of some of the complications arising from these surgical meshes, the FDA has recalled a variety of hernia mesh implants over the years.

One of the first surgical meshes to be recalled was the Kugel hernia mesh, manufactured by C. Their devices were recalled in , and because of the dangers of the mesh breaking and leading to bowel perforation or enteric fistula, an abnormal connection between organs.

Atrium, the manufacturer of C-QUR, also received warning letters from the FDA beginning in because the company didn't address issues with the device, like its cause of infection and inadequacies in the sterility of the manufacturing environment. When the company still didn't address these issues, the FDA put out a Class 2 recall for C-QUR, meaning exposure to this violative product could cause temporary health risks.

Following this recall, the FDA later filed a lawsuit against Atrium in because of poor quality control at their plant in New Hampshire, which temporarily stopped production of C-QUR and other similar devices.

Ethicon's Physiomesh faced a different kind of recall, as well. Ethicon decided to remove the product following a review of various studies revealing high hernia recurrence rates and other complications. Prior settlements and verdicts for hernia mesh and vaginal mesh lawsuits can give claimants an idea of what to expect in future cases.

With thousands of lawsuits against these hernia mesh devices, there have been many notable settlements and verdicts already. Prior settlements and verdicts in hernia mesh lawsuits and similar lawsuits against vaginal mesh implants may help pave the way for what claimants can expect in these lawsuits moving forward. In a related lawsuit, Ethicon was found liable in the case of a New Jersey woman who experienced complications as a result of their transvaginal mesh implant , the TVT-Secur transvaginal tape.

Much like their hernia mesh devices, Ethicon's TVT-Secur was made with a polypropylene mesh and moved to market in through the FDA's k clearance program, meaning the product didn't have to undergo numerous clinical trials for approval. The Philadelphia jury concluded that Ethicon had made a defective product. Even after making this large settlement, the company is still facing thousands of vaginal mesh and hernia mesh lawsuits.

That same year, C. Bard has faced thousands of claims against many of their mesh implants for hernias and pelvic surgeries for being faulty and causing serious complications. Even with these large payouts, the manufacturer continues to face a mounting number of lawsuits. As of May , MDL has more than 2, pending lawsuits. Given the ongoing novel coronavirus COVID pandemic, that date may change again in the near future.

At this time, MDL does not have an estimated start date. The lawsuit was brought against Ethicon's Prolift surgical mesh implant after the plaintiff suffered post-implant injuries. With this recent verdict, as well as numerous other settlements against similar devices, experts expect to see many other losses for these manufacturing companies once these trials get underway.